Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No - Approved Document B allows these to be treated as a protected shaft where the walls and doors to the sides need to be fire resistant, but the shaft can be open all the way up.

Far too many risk assessors have wasted considerable amounts of client money on unnecessary floor stopping  -it's not cheap and for retrospective installs quite difficult too.

 

Guest Martinus
Posted
On 07/02/2024 at 20:10, AnthonyB said:

No - Approved Document B allows these to be treated as a protected shaft where the walls and doors to the sides need to be fire resistant, but the shaft can be open all the way up.

Far too many risk assessors have wasted considerable amounts of client money on unnecessary floor stopping  -it's not cheap and for retrospective installs quite difficult too.

 

Anthony, 

Thanks. I fully agree. But it seems to be a trend now.
So many local authorities think it’s the right thing to do now, based on their interpretation of general compartmentation advice. While the too many Fire safety/Firestopping companies that probably know better,  say nothing because they like the work. 
 

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...