Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, I heard a FR assessor quoting that once you had completed your travel distance to a relative place of safety. eg.  (45m to a protected corridor ,stairwell ,) then the 45 m rule began again to the final exit.

I have never heard of this but thought surely it would be an assessment of what’s reasonable based on the fire protection  of the route, occupancy, risk etc.

Happy to be corrected. Still very much in the learning phase , which I assume never ends.

Your comments appreciated.

Cheers

Posted

No it doesn't - once you are in the protected route it should lead to a final exit and so travel distance is to a large sense irrelevant - otherwise you would never get a building over 6 floors.

Also it's only 45m where escape is available in 2 directions, 18m in a single direction (figures differ slightly for different usages and risk levels)

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...