Mike North

The use of magnetic hold open devices kind of defeats what the regulations are trying to do here. Without seeing the doors, I suspect you have 2 options; 1. Change the swing of the doors 2. Limit the occupancy of the room

For multiple doors try Our Services - Fire Doors - IMS Group - A Specialist Passive Fire Protection Company

You could take a general image of the area to show the general location, then a close image of the label details before you remove the labels

You may get certification to say that the building was built to building regulations, however a building that was built in the 1980s it does not mean it comply with the current building regulations. Any alterations or maintenance to building would make the original certification null and void as what was signed off is not what was is there now. You need to look at the regulation 38 information, which should be an up-to-date record of all the fire safety information for the building Including fire doors along with the latest FRA and any recent fire surveys to get an holistic view.

The correct US advice (which does not differ from the UK) Following a building fire in the US, if asbestos is suspected, prioritize safety by restricting access to the affected area, informing occupants, and contacting a licensed asbestos surveyor. Avoid disturbing suspected materials and ensure professional asbestos abatement if asbestos is confirmed.

If you have concerns than you need the advice of an asbestos survey company. Your insurance company should be dealing with it. How quickly should an asbestos inspection be carried out? Before re-entry Is it safe to enter the property before testing? If you suspect, then NO, it may be illegal under the HSW act What precautions should be taken during cleanup? Removal should only be done by an approved asbestos removal company

look at the installation instructions for the door, some can some can't

Building regulations can only be applied to new buildings or material alterations whilst they are being built, can you imagine the cost of bringing Windsor castle up to date? You won’t get certification to say it meets the regulations. Once a building is built and handed over, building regulations are out of the window except for material alterations. The fire safety order then comes onto force which (amongst other things) requires the responsible person (or their agent) to conduct a fire risk assessment on the building and address the findings. It is not a money-making scheme, If the glazing says it is fire rated, then unless the assessor can prove it isn’t then it’s acceptable

To certify a repair to a fire door you must know what the original certification was and what is allowed to be done to the door under the certificate if approval. I also don’t think that this would be covered under an Approved Repair Technique

Possible solution is a free swing closure such as Briton 996 Hold Open Free-Swing Door Closer

I assume that the removed closers where Percos? Why did you not just cut the chains, problem solved. I don’t think you could certify a repair

British standards are not a legal requirement, however, the man with the curly wig may have some serious concerns if you do not follow them. If a building is unoccupied for any length of time, there is nothing wrong with reducing all the building inspection regime (along with the Alarm testing) as long as prior to the reoccupation all testing is completed, this reduced maintenance should be written in the maintenance instructions for the building. Don't forget that if the building is unoccupied the maintenance may reduce but the chances of arson may increase.

What is the difference in measurements? If its only small (1 to 2 mm) its probably 1. Operator eyesight 2. Different operator 3. Different expansion rates (walls, doors, wood) 4. Movement of the building

I think that this is a bit of a grey area, is it some doors that need replacing like for like through wear and tear? Then probably not If you are changing the fire strategy, then definitely yes. Anything between the two, could go either way

Looks like an overzealous manager A guide to making your small block of flats safe from fire (accessible) - GOV.UK 4 Fire Hazards Housekeeping Good housekeeping is fundamental to reducing the risk from fire in the common parts. The common parts should be kept clear of any combustible materials or storage. There should be a zero-tolerance approach, in which residents are not permitted to use the common parts to store any belongings or dispose of rubbish. However, in well-managed, secure blocks, it is often acceptable to permit items of lower risk in the common parts, such as doormats, pot plants and pictures on walls.